The TOTAL Universe : the new Paradigm of Science

Let us suppose that one asks: “What is it the age of the human, on which date of the year was he born? Which is his height? What is his mass (or "weight")? , etc

Then you will logically ask whether this question relates to a particular human or humans in general, the generic human or "human TOTAL". We can define him as the Set of all humans (past, present or future, etc.).

If the questions relates to a particular human, then these questions have meaning, since only only a human particular huùan can have a certain age (for example 50 years), a certain height (for example 1.7 meter), a certain mass (or "weight"), etc.

But if we are talking about the human in general, the "TOTAL human", then it is completely another thing! Indeed, the "TOTAL human" (that also menans the general and generic human) has all ages, all birthdays, his height goes from the height of the Pygmies to the height of the tallest American basketball players, his mass (or "weight") goes from the babies ones to the mass of Japanese sumo wrestlers ...etc.

So these questions are absurd if we speaks about the "TOTAL human" (the general and generic human). But if we ask this questions, that means we are not talking about the "TOTAL human", but about a particular human, a NON-TOTAL human. That is all the problem.

With regard to the Universe, the kind of raised questions have a meaning only if we speak about a particular universe like OUR universe, and not of the TOTAL Universe. Exactly as if we ask these question about a particular galaxy as OUR our galaxy the Milky Way, about a particular solar system as OUR solar system, or about a partcular planet as OUR planet.

In other words, from now on, let us just say "OUR universe" like we say "OUR galaxy" or "OUR town". If we want to talk about "THE Universe", this must be the TOTAL Universe !

But unfortunately, the Universe hidden behind the questions of the current sciences is the one that can be defined like this : "the Set of the all things that EXIST", what implicitly rests on the axiom that "Certain things do not exist". That Universe can also be defined as that "Set of all things that are POSSIBLE", what thus implies that "Certain things are not possible", and so on. This is what we call the NON-TOTAL Universe, the INCOMPLETE Universe.

In that paradigm, the goal of the science is to make the share between the things which exist and those which do not exist, between the things that are possible and those that are impossible, between the things which are true and those which are not true, between the things that are reality and those that are not reality, and so on. It is in that mind that the current physicists ask for example if the Higgs Boson exists. For it can not exist... But this implicit axiom with which the current science is maked hides a very subtle and vicious Paradox, unknown up to now (see ).

Contrary to the NON-TOTAL Universe, we talk now about the TOTAL Universe, simply defined as the Set of all things (but not as for example the Set of all things that EXIST). This seemingly insignificant detail is very important!

For in the TOTAL Universe so defined, all things exist, and the contrary of all things too! All things are possible, and the contrary of all things too! All things are true, and the contrary of all things too! All things are reality, and the contrary of all things too!

In a certain particular context of the TOTAL Universe, or in a certain particular univers as for example OURS, a certain thing can not exist, can not be possible, can not be true, and so on. But in the TOTAL Universe, this thing exists necessarily, it is possible, it is true, etc.

With the notion of the TOTAL Universe, the science (in particular fundamental science), its methodology, its goal and its possibilities completely change! We now propose the TOTAL Universe as the new paradigm of the Science, we initiate the cience in this paradigm. Any person who wants can contribute to develop this science, he (she) can build on the foundations which we posed (Revelation 22 : 13, 17).